Fighting Mandates: Letters & Lawyers for Employees and Students vs. Illegal Mandates (Vaccines, Masks, Tests)
PERK Campaigns Right to Refuse. National RIGHT TO REFUSE. We have carefully designed document templates to support your Right to Refuse. You may use these to protect your rights, empower your knowledge, or notify your employer or school officials of the laws and regulations that protect you. https://www.perk-group.com/right-to-refuse
Submit your DHHS civil rights complaints against your or someone else's employer or healthcare related entity (hospitals, medical groups, medical schools etc). It is fairly brief and you can attach any one of a multitude of documents supporting your contention that the investigational vaccines should be handled free of pressure, coercion, or threat of reprisal. E.g. this document could be attached. or any of the studies listed here, as well as adverse events data.
Also see Resources for Students from Make Americans Free Again. Massachusetts Stand Up Chapter
08/30/21 Here’s Why No One Can [Legally] Force You to Take Pfizer’s Newly ‘Approved’ Comirnaty Vaccine. When the FDA announced full approval of Pfizer’s Comirnaty COVID vaccine, the media predicted an avalanche of mandates — but the FDA’s own Fact Sheet for the vaccine states it is “your choice to receive or not receive” the vaccine. ... the final sentence of the fact sheet states: “This EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and COMIRNATY will end when the Secretary of HHS determines that the circumstances justifying the EUA no longer exist or when there is a change in the approval status of the product such that an EUA is no longer needed.” ... According to this fact sheet, the FDA also has designated the licensed Comirnaty vaccine as an EUA product. By doing so, the FDA has guaranteed the Comirnaty vaccine the same liability shield as the EUA Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. See
Q&A for Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA) The Vaccine Information Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers sheet linked from the CDC's Comirnaty info https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna clearly says: "WHAT IF I DECIDE NOT TO GET COMIRNATY (COVID-19 VACCINE, mRNA) OR THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE? Under the EUA, it is your choice to receive or not receive the vaccine. ..."
The table below shows how to do RELATIVE and ABSOLUTE risk/benefit calculations using known Comirnaty trial data and actual blood clotting results shown by D-dimer tests as one example. The ABSOLUTE risks of COVID vaccination, especially to young persons is far higher than the absolute benefit.
Check this web page to use the original trial data absolute risk/benefits for the 3 EUA vaccines in the US. http://www.kathydopp.info/COVIDinfo/Vaccines/RisksCovidVsRisksCovVaccines
By using the misleading RELATIVE risk calculation, the CDC/FDA and vaccine manufacturers Falsely made it appear as if the benefits of Covid vaccines are greater than the risks. Such claims of benefits exceeding risks are False due to the misuse of RELATIVE risk rather than ABSOLUTE risk calculations that the CDC/FDA permitted the vaccine manufacturers to use. The manufactures' own original trial data shows the risks outweigh the benefits for most age groups. Data needed for the Risk calculations are hi-lighted in yellow. Of course, if the FDA/CDC weren't lying to the public about the availability of effective preventatives and treatments, the alleged absolute benefit of the vaccines is virtually zero.
Sources of data for the calculation include: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna and https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Dr. Malone Sounds Alarm On Liability Coverage Of Pfizer Vax. August 24, 2021. FDA falsely claims there is no controversy regarding safety and efficacy so no need for public input during an outside advisory committee meeting; and ignored recently reported data, citing original vaccine manufacturer out-dated study data.
Absolute Risks from the Original Vaccine Trials of Serious COVID-19 versus Risks of COVID Vaccine Severe Vaccine Adverse Effects were never calculated by the makers or required by the FDA. Here they are on the relatively healthy population in the trials. July 26, 2021.
Physicians for Informed Consent. Education: COVID-19 Vaccines. Explore key questions and answers about the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
- Pfizer risk statement: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Pfizer-COVID-19-Vaccine-Risk-Statement.pdf
- Moderna risk statement: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/moderna-covid-19-vaccine-risk-statement/
- Johnson & Johnson risk statement: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Janssen-Johnson-Johnson-COVID-19-Vaccine-Risk-Statement.pdf
No Jab, No Job breaches UK Law – It’s time to save the Carers… August 5, 2021.
ANNA DE BUISSERET SERVES NOTICE OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY ON UK COVID VACCINATORS UNDER NUREMBERG CODE. August 1, 2021.
UK Lawyers Serve Notices of Liability on COVID Vaccinators Who Administer Shots Without Obtaining Full Informed Consent
by Mordechai Sones, America’s Frontline Doctors. July 11, 2021
UK attorney Anna de Buisseret today announced serving Notices of Liability on COVID-19 clinics and individuals administering the experimental biological agent known as the “COVID-19 vaccine” without obtaining fully informed consent, freely given in accordance with the Nuremberg Code and UK and International law.
“COVID jabs are experimental and still in phase 3 clinical trials,” de Buisseret explained. “The Nuremberg Code therefore applies. The injector MUST obtain the individuals fully informed consent freely given. All MATERIAL RISKS must be made clear to them and an individual risk assessment conducted.”
De Buisseret said among those served is Chief Medical Officer (CMO) for England, UK government’s Chief Medical Advisor, and head of the public health profession Professor Chris Whitty.
In April, Doctors for COVID Ethics served Notices of Liability for COVID-19 vaccine harms and deaths on all European Parliament Members.
According to the FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines: DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes = ***Subject to change*** Guillain-Barré syndrome Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis Transverse myelitis Encephalitis / myelitis / encephalomyelitis / meningoencephalitis / meningitis / encepholapathy Convulsions / seizures Stroke Narcolepsy and cataplexy Anaphylaxis Acute myocardial infarction Myocarditis / pericarditis Autoimmune disease DeathsPregnancy and birth outcomes Other acute demyelinating diseases Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions Thrombocytopenia Disseminated intravascular coagulation Venous thromboembolism Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain Kawasaki disease Multi-system Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Vaccine enhanced disease Source: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020 Meeting Presentation
June 16, 2021. Right to Refuse bills Moving Strong in 9 More States! There are 9 more states where right to refuse bills are moving and getting close to passage including Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin. And two new states, Delaware and Oregon, that have introduced Right to Refuse bills.
Push back against Mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations. 06/01/2021. Push back against Mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations! Here is information based on publicly available sources – that you can use to write a letter or with which to seek the assistance of legal counsel
Under federal preemption doctrine, this federal EUA law trumps state law, according to Holland and Glaser, who said states and municipalities may not mandate EUA products. As the FDA states:
“FDA believes that the terms and conditions of an EUA issued under section 564 preempt state or local law, both legislative requirements and common-law duties, that impose different or additional requirements on the medical product for which the EUA was issued in the context of the emergency declared under section 564 … In an emergency, it is critical that the conditions that are part of the EUA or an order or waiver issued pursuant to section 564A — those that FDA has determined to be necessary or appropriate to protect the public health— be strictly followed, and that no additional conditions be imposed.”
This was also confirmed in August 2020 at a CDC published meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, where the committee’s executive secretary, Dr. Amanda Cohn, stated (@1:14:40):
“I just wanted to add that, just wanted to remind everybody, that under an Emergency Use Authorization, an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandated.”
EUA law preventing mandates is so explicit that only one case exists regarding an attempt to mandate an EUA vaccine. In that case, Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5573 (D.D.C. Apr. 6, 2005), the court held that the vaccine could not be mandated, even for people in the military.
The Right to Refuse National Campaign has been launched to help state organizations and grassroots advocates connect with each other for the purpose of passing state laws that would protect the rights of individuals to make their own health decisions. RighttoRefuse.org is a special website to inform citizens of legislation being introduced and passed and the groups working at their state capitols that need your support.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, is a German-American attorney with a license to practice law in both California and Germany, is leading a group of hundreds of lawyers internationally who are bringing charges for crimes against humanity and Nuremberg Code violations associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including forced business closures, fraudulent PCR tests and of course vaccine mandates and the lack of informed consent with these vaccines. This international legal effort is being dubbed "Nuremberg 2". Here is a link to an interview Dr. Fuellmich in which he states that preliminary trials will begin within the next couple of weeks.
Robert Barnes is a prominent constitutional attorney who explains in detail how employers are setting themselves up for liability and litigation by mandating these vaccines in this video.
How to overcome the pressure to get a COVID vaccine. If I were an employee or student who was required or feeling coerced into getting a COVID vaccine, here’s how I would strategically handle it… May 27, 2021
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. launches challenge against COVID vaccines’ emergency use authorization. The Children's Health Defense chief legal counsel's petition calls for revocation of the EUA status that allows children under age 18 to receive the shot. May 25, 2021.
Legal Brief: All U.S. Employees Are Protected From Mandated COVID Injections. May 21, 2021. A legal memo from Liberty Counsel Action is suitable for print and distribution to employers of all sizes, in order to protect employee rights under American law. Forced mandates are illegal. Discrimination against the non-vaccinated is also illegal. ⁃ TN Editor
May 22, 2021. " OSHA has gotten the memo" and altered its guidance to state:
DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.
Previously, just two days earlier, on 05/20/21 Employers May Be Held Liable for ‘Any Adverse Reaction’ if They Mandate COVID Vaccines. New OSHA guidance held employers liable for adverse reactions if they require employees be vaccinated for COVID as a condition of employment, which could negatively impact the employer’s safety rating. Not so, any more.
05/18/21 Federal Law Prohibits Mandates of Emergency Use COVID Vaccines, Tests, Masks — 3 Resources You Can Use to Inform Your School or Employer
COVID Fraud – Lawyers & Medical Experts start legal proceedings against W.H.O and World Leaders for ‘Crimes against Humanity’. May 15, 2021. ... the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention. The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws. ..The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:
- Provides immunity to the virus. This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.
- Protects recipients from getting the virus. This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.
- Reduces deaths from the virus infection. This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection.
- Reduces circulation of the virus. This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.
- Reduces transmission of the virus
You’ve Been Served Notice! CVS, Rite Aid Liable for The Potential Danger of Indiscriminate COVID-19 Vaccination. May 8, 2021. "...the vast majority of persons who are naturally immune from prior SARS-CoV-2 infections gain little to no benefit from additional vaccination. ...vaccination of the naturally immune is simply an unnecessary medical treatment in the vast majority of such persons. And you all know that any complications resulting from a medical treatment that is unnecessary, no matter how “rare”, fit under the category of “unreasonable harm. ...CDC guideline indicates that persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 should wait for 3 months before getting vaccinated — this is an implicit acknowledgement that such persons are at risk of harm. ...Specifically, I am informing you that if indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination in persons who are naturally immune or recently infected triggers serious illness or death, your awareness of this possibility now, poses a serious liability to your corporations — and especially IF you do not act to mitigate against this risk of harm to, at least some of your customers nationwide."
COVID vaccine package inserts do not list all the reported side effects and are not being given to the vaccinated. Pharmacist Shows Blank COVID 19 Vaccine Insert. May 7, 2021.
- View the Pfizer package insert
- View the Moderna package insert
- View the Johnson & Johnson package insert
ICAN “FACT CHECKS” COVID-19 VACCINE CLAIMS BY 12 ATTORNEYS GENERAL May 14, 2021. Given its intent to promote the COVID-19 vaccines, ICAN pointed out that the AGs letter should include a disclaimer required by federal law and the EUAs for these vaccines, which provide: All descriptive printed matter, advertising, and promotional material relating to the use of the  COVID‑19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously shall state that: This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA. ...ICAN agreed with the AGs that vaccine misinformation is a real issue that needs to be addressed and that is why ICAN requested that the AGs confirm that the issues within their letter have been corrected.
Fighting mandatory vaccines to keep your job? COVID Legal USA assists self-represented/pro se litigants in executing their legal battles*. Read more about COVID Legal USA here. Contact us with a brief description of your legal matter and a representative will get back to you within 24 hours.
COVID Vaccines Should Not Be Required to Return to Campus, States the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. April 26, 2021
1,000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Have Filed a Lawsuit for Violations of the Nuremberg Code May 9, 2021 by Soren Dreier
Employers may be liable for ‘any adverse reaction’ from mandated coronavirus shots: OSHA. It’s also possible that employers requiring the injections may be held legally liable for violating federal law. May 10, 2021
Corona Investigative Committee International Legal Offensive Reiner Fuellmich - Part 2. May 3, 2021
DECLARATION OF CANADIAN PHYSICIANS FOR SCIENCE AND TRUTH. The Nuremberg Code, drafted in the aftermath of the atrocities perpetrated within the Nazi concentration camps – where horrific medical experiments were performed on inmates without consent – expressly forbids the imposition of any kind of intervention without informed consent.
Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease. Timothy Cardozo Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU , Ronald Veazey Division of Comparative Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine. March 2021.
Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
U.S. Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA. By Aaron Siri Feb. 23, 2021 https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/federal-law-prohibits-employers-and-others-from-requiring-vaccination-with-a-covid-19-vaccine-distributed-under-an-eua/ While organizations are certainly free to encourage their employees, students, and other members to be vaccinated, federal law provides that, at least until the vaccine is licensed, individuals must have the option to accept or decline to be vaccinated.
The COVID-19 vaccines are *not* approved by the FDA and are listed as "experimental" under Emergency Use Authorization. Threats to deny fundamental rights to travel, to work, to attend public events, and to attend school may not be used to coerce persons to be subjects of experimental medical procedures, and no informed consent, if given, can release the institution administering them from liability for negligence.
The Nuremberg Code, drafted in 1947, requires Informed Consent, without “the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion…”
The UN Declaration on BioEthics, negotiated, Article 6, Consent, states: “ Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned.”
According to US Code 21 CFR § 50.20: General requirements for informed consent, no informed consent, whether oral or written, may include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject's legal rights, or releases or appears to release the institution, or its agents, from liability for negligence.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political rights (ICCPR) ratified by the USA in 1992, has become the supreme law of our land equivalent to federal law. It has a prohibition on medical experimentation providing that “no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.”
Persons may exert their right not to be vaccinated or to possess a vaccine certificate by writing or stating: “I do not give informed consent to be vaccinated.”
Government Cannot Force You to Take the COVID Vaccine. April 30, 2021
Here are a list of US colleges planning to violate International and Federal and, sometimes, state laws by coercing students or employees to receive experimental medical procedures - the COVID vaccine that poses higher risk to most students than the SARS-COV-2 virus.
International Criminal Court, The Hague, accepted covid-19 complaint of violation of Nuremberg Code by Israeli government. March 13, 2021
Video: Why is Israel being taken before the Hague Criminal Court for human rights violations re. its Covid vaccination policies?
Similarly, PCR testing is *not* approved by the FDA. According to the CDC, "If a school is implementing a testing strategy, testing should be offered on a voluntary basis. It is unethical and illegal to test someone who does not want to be tested, including students whose parents or guardians do not want them to be tested."
What would real informed consent look like?
In my family, we have a rule: If you consider having an experimental medical procedure done,
Don’t even think of insisting that anyone else have it done, inside or outside the family, because they control their own bodies and health decisions, not you; and
Be sure you have read about and can explain in your own words all of the known risks of that procedure before embarking on it. Also, consider potential future risks.
I ask that you, the reader, at least take time to consider the above, and at least consider reading information in the links below, before submitting to this experimental medical procedure.
Is the COVID vaccine experimental? Pfizer and Moderna make the COVID-19 vaccines in the US. The FDA granted “emergency use authorization” for these vaccines (herein “COVID injections,” because they are unlike conventional vaccines). Emergency use authorization is required by law to be made only if there are no effective treatments for COVID-19.
- But are there effective COVID-19 treatments? – 100s of studies done around the world have established, and repeatedly confirmed, fast, effective, well-tolerated treatments for COVID-19 that are in widespread use. I briefly summarize them here.
- General risk vs benefit – An emergency experimental vaccine cannot be assumed to be safer than a virus with a very high survival rate, such as COVID-19. The average survival rate for NO COVID treatment at all is 99.74%, and we have very successful treatments available, which should easily achieve universal survivability from COVID, if widely available. Where does 99.74% survival come from? Dr. John Ioannidis is the most widely cited scientist in the world. His estimate in June 2020 of a 0.26% infection fatality rate is now confirmed around the world. 100% – 0.26% = 99.74% average survival rate.
Does the COVID injection work? The COVID injection is not even known to stop the spread of COVID. Dr. Larry Corey, who oversees National Institutes of Health COVID-19 vaccine trials said on 11/20/20: “The studies aren’t designed to assess transmission. They don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this point in time.” https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/941388
What happened to the animals in the studies? This technology has been tried on animals, and in the animal studies done, all the animals died, not immediately from the injection, but months later, from other immune disorders, sepsis and/or cardiac failure. There has never been a long-term successful animal study using this technology. No experimental coronavirus vaccine has succeeded in animal studies. In this study, coronavirus vaccine caused liver inflammation in test animals.
Specific risks of COVID injections, in roughly chronological order of side-effect manifestation:
Cationic lipid coating of mRNA is known for many years to be toxic, because these (+) charged fats interact with the (–) charges on our amino acids, our cell membranes and the phosphates of our DNA. Cationic lipids are attracted to and are destructive toward:
mRNA: Unlike a traditional vaccine, of injected, inactivated virus intended to stimulate antibody response, the COVID injection on the other hand is completely different in this respect. It uses messenger RNA (mRNA), which is a blueprint for your cells to create COVID-like (spike) proteins. Then your cells begin to make these COVID-like proteins. However, those proteins, in turn, stimulate your body to make antibodies against them. So now your body has been turned into a munitions factory for both sides of a war: The bad guys (COVID-like spike proteins) and the good guys (the antibodies fighting against them). However, before you pledge allegiance to the good guys, as you will see below, the good guys can be more lethal to the vaccinated person.
History of mRNA injections: This technology had disastrous results in dengue fever vaccines in the past. Dengue vaccine is a mRNA vaccine. When this was used in children in the Philippines, many vaccinated children had far worse outcomes than unvaccinated children when they were later exposed to dengue, and many died. Prosecution for homicide resulted. However, this had previously been known to happen with ferrets and with cats. In all cases, the vaccinated animal or human became more vulnerable to worse disease when confronted with it. It is expected that the relatively mild COVID-19 illness, with a survival rate of 99.74%, may reduce to a much lower survival rate and become a truly lethal disease in vaccinated people when they later become infected with it. There are no peer-reviewed published human trials of mRNA vaccines at all, and no mRNA vaccine has ever been FDA approved. That’s how new the technology is.
mRNA can affect DNA. One of the most worrisome risks with a mRNA vaccine is what can happen with reverse transcriptase. This is an enzyme in every cell, and it can theoretically lead to the mRNA creating changes in the cells’ DNA, a process known as viral retro-integration. Although this possibility had been thought unlikely, MIT and Harvard scientists found it happened here. If some of the 30 trillion or so cells in your body become permanent COVID factories, what is the long-term impact on your health, and would you want that outcome?
Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) problem: Prior attempts to create a coronavirus vaccine killed all the test animals, after they were later infected with wild virus. Here’s what happened: mRNA instructed the mammals’ cells to produce the spike proteins of the coronavirus. Then, later, when the animals confronted the wild virus, the intense build-up of antibodies had been stockpiled, and their sudden and overwhelming release killed the test animal. These risks have been documented in Nature, Science and Journal of Infectious Diseases. Here’s a study from Nature on that.
ADE mechanism: ADE is a form of pathogenic priming, meaning the vaccine can result in a more severe disease, which has been seen in prior attempts at making coronavirus vaccines. The antibodies made can be neutralizing (which inactivate a virus, and that’s good), but antibodies are a problem when they are non-neutralizing, because then these antibodies carry active viruses directly to macrophages, which then become infected. This is how ADE happens.
This antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) leads to:
increased viral replication (more viruses to make you sick); and
ADE result: These macrophages tend to go to the lungs and fill the lungs, causing overwhelming inflammation and airway obstruction (as found later on autopsy). However, the augmented antibodies also attack similar-looking proteins on internal organs, resulting in cytokine storm and death or auto-immune disease and organ failure. “Cats that showed high titers following vaccination succumbed at later timepoints to fatal disease.”
What about miscarriages, and why have men been advised to freeze their sperm prior to getting the injection? Both men and women are at risk for possibly permanent infertility, because the spike protein of a coronavirus “looks” to the immune system similar to Syncytin-1, an essential protein in the placenta. This stimulates antibodies to fight the placenta, and possibly sperm. Mid-term miscarriages, which are normally very rare, have occurred in women who have been vaccinated for COVID. SARS-CoV-2 viral particles have been found to linger in the testicles of men after recovery from infection.
Why are COVID vaccinees MORE likely to spread COVID than the unvaccinated? Virologist Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, who worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, recently warned the World Health Organization (WHO) that “We are currently turning vaccinees into carriers shedding infectious variants.”
Why is it more dangerous to vaccinate against COVID-19 than other viruses? Because COVID-19 virus uses the ACE-2 receptor to get into your endothelial cells, including those lining the blood vessels. This creates an inflammatory reaction that the great majority (99.74%) have survived even without treatment, and even more who used known, effective treatments. (See page 1) So if you have been exposed to the virus, and then get vaccinated, it is almost certain that the vaccine will cause new inflammation and damage to endothelial cells lining your blood vessels, and we have seen short-term abnormal blood clotting in people who have gotten the vaccine. But the more likely problem is launching new disease in the blood vessels. Dr. H Noorchashm MD, PhD says, “. . . the vaccine is almost certain to do damage to the vascular endothelium.” He explains here.
Israel is at this writing the most heavily COVID-vaccinated country in the world. The findings of infectious disease experts are reported here, in which they determined, from the Israeli data, that the COVID injection causes:
” . . .mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly . . .”
Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA By Aaron Siri Feb. 23, 2021
Brussels Council of Europe: No compulsory vaccinations and no discrimination against the unvaccinated On 27 January, the Council of Europe signed Resolution 2361, which states that vaccinations in EU Member States should not be mandatory. Furthermore, persons who have not been vaccinated may not be discriminated against in any way. This effectively stops the notion of "vaccine passports". February 9, 2021
“Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials” – This technical paper in Medicina concludes that reporting only relative risk reduction, rather than absolute risk reduction, in the vaccines trials “breaches the ethical and legal obligations of informed consent” (Absolute risk reduction on Moderna vaccine is 1.1%. Absolute risk reduction of Pfizer vaccine is 0.7% versus the reported relative risk reductions of 95%.)
Since COVID Vaccines Are Experimental, Vaccine Administrators Must Inform You of Risks. By Alliance for Natural Health International February 2021.
The three prerequisites for informed consent.
- It must be given voluntarily— without coercion or deceit.
- It must be given by an individual who has mental capacity.
- BEFORE giving consent, a person needs to have been fully informed about the issue. That includes being informed about what the risks and benefits of the treatment or vaccination are, as well as the risks and benefits of going without the treatment or vaccination, and what alternate options might be available.
More Information or Organizations Taking Action
Health Freedom Defense Fund healthfreedomdefense.org seeks to ameliorate health injustice through education and advocacy. We aid families and individuals whose health rights have been infringed and support legal challenges to unjust laws that undermine our health and freedoms. If your rights have been infringed, we may be able to help.
Parents sue over mandatory COVID testing in Park City, Utah schools Mar 12, 2021. “The Utah Department of Health’s Order permitting schools to implement mandatory COVID-19 testing as a condition of in-person learning is an unconstitutional invasion of rights. The Court should enjoin Defendants from requiring mandatory testing as a condition of in-person learning.“ It continues: “Among these are the rights to be treated equally with regards to access to in-person public education; to a zone of privacy about healthcare decisions, including to refrain from undergoing unnecessary or experimental medical testing; to due process of law before fundamental government benefits—such as the right to a public education—are withheld; the rights of parents to make medical decisions for their minor children; and, fundamentally, the right to be free of state coercion to “consent” to testing that is, in operation and in effect, contrary to prevailing medical and scientific guidelines, including the very authorities cited as support for that policy.“
Health Rights MASS. Working to protect your right to make your own health decisions, for yourself and your family
Australian Government Department of Health. January 2021 - Video Informed Consent | Is your right to medical freedom being respected?
Complaint to the GMC about Mandatory Vaccines. February 2021.
America's Frontline Doctors' The Vaccine Bill of Rights January 14, 2021
STOP MEDICAL DISCRIMINATION. Petition to Stop Forced Experimental Vaccines
Stop forced Covid-19 Shots, Pfizer's World HQ, NYC, January 2021